Showing posts with label OUCS106. Show all posts
Showing posts with label OUCS106. Show all posts

Monday, 28 March 2011

Modernity Essay

Graphic Design - Year 1
Critical and Contextual Studies
Claudia Griffin

Focusing on specific examples, describe the way that Modernist art and design was a response to the forces of modernity?
Modernity is a historical period of time, recognized as being from 1750-1950, in which came many changes to the Western world that were believed to be improving life for everyone, due to the processes of industrialisation, urbanisation, mass production, and the emergence of new technologies and materials.  Modern was seen as a positive term, promoting progress, and proving that the new is better than the old. As modern technology appeared, easily accessible transport came to existence and urban living grew in popularity. These are examples of the forces of modernity, which are expressed in Modernist art and design – Modernism.
Instead of living in rural areas, people shifted towards the towns, meaning that many more people lived in one area. There were bountiful developments, which people put their faith in, believing that they would advance the world, but downsides came with this mass urbanisation. With so many people, from all backgrounds and wealth living in such a close, condensed social space, society became secular and fragmented. Despite more people living closer together, many began to feel distant and alienated, with people eventually starting to worry that modern life was sending them mad.
The railway, which became a method of transport for passengers in the 1820’s, is a very important force of modernity, as it made different areas that were previously unavailable easily accessible to all, so that people could now learn about and see more of the world. The importance of this new technology called for the sense of world time to become regulated to Greenwich Mean Time in 1847. By 1855, the majority of the clocks in Great Britain were standardized, which demonstrates how modernity controlled life. Technological advances impressed people, such as the invention of the telephone (1876), automobiles (1889) and the airplane (1903). Leisure activities like shopping became available, totally changing how people could spend their free time. People turned to science and psychology instead of only accepting religion. As a result of these forces of modernity that were inescapable for those living in the urban towns, life dramatically altered. The opportunity to access more information, learning about the different people and cultures of the world, somehow left everybody separated. And with all the new technology, processes and material available, art and design changed in reply.
This essay will look at art and design created in the Bauhaus’ modernist project. The Bauhaus (building house) school was an influential art school which was the main place of modern design and architecture, achieving something different to the other art schools of the time with its constructive thinking and revolutionary ideas. The school, which believed that the crafts were equal with the arts and so the separation between the two should be destroyed, had a Utopian aim of creating pure, good quality, functional designs that could improve everyday life for everybody. Students were taught in workshops by master craftsmen, learning about materials and textures rather than just art history. It operated from 1919 – 1933, born out of catastrophe after the 1st World War, but was eventually forced to close as the Nazi's as they thought it was too progressive.
The forces of modernity did not always lead to positive, empowering outcomes, but sometimes to despair. Society became faster, with people struggling to keep up, and falling into depression.  People were lost in this mass of new technology. In acknowledgement, Modernist artists tried to provide a solution with their designs, so that people could stay positive and things could progress in a way that wasn’t dizzying, and didn’t distract them from their life. As Barnard says,
‘There is a sense in which modernism represents a dissatisfaction with the modern world and sees a variety of ways in which it may be made better.’ (Barnard 2005:113)
Universal, the geometric typeface designed by Herbert Bayer in between 1925-28, was designed to be an easy to read and understand font that could be used worldwide eternally. It contains only lowercase letters, as Bayer thought uppercase letters were irrelevant.
‘Bayer eliminated capital letters, contending that because the uppercase/lowercase distinction does not occur in speech, it is artificial and unnecessary.’ (Roosevelt 1999:192)
The type is sans serif, free from any form of decoration. It was believed that excessively decorating was a sign of backward development, that ornament was crime. Therefore, only what is needed should be used. A value of modernism in graphic design is ‘the reduction of elements to a minimum.’ (Aynsley 2005)
Bayer’s desire was for Universal to become a standardised, clear and neutral typeface, with the aim of aiding communication.
Universal contains aspects of what modernism is generally believed to be in graphic design. Despite attempts of defining what modernist art is, there are no agreed characteristics which apply to all pieces, only ‘family resemblances’.  No piece could contain all the elements associated with modernist design, or it would become hypocritical.
In contrast to this font is the German font Fraktur, which is not neutral or free from decoration. Fraktur is not international, being well known for regularly being used in only German design.  This is not what the Bauhaus modernist artists wanted; their approach to design showed their wishes for inequality to vanish, making the world a better place for all.
Not everybody saw modernist work as progressive; anti-modernists disagreed with the new creations. Just as city space is becoming dehumanised by urbanisation, by having just one universal typeface, there is no space for individuality. Modernity does promote equality, but it denies difference. Even the Modernist typographer Jan Tschichold described modernism as ‘impersonal creativity.’ (Fiell 2005:20)
The building of the second Bauhaus school is a perfect example of modernist architecture.  Moving for political reasons, the Bauhaus school was located in three different locations during its time. Designed by Walter Gropius, the found of the Bauhaus, the second school was built in 1925 in just over a year, in Dessau, Germany. Behind the modern buildings of the time was the idea that they would be practical to use and could be made quickly, cheap and easily. They should fit in with the modern world and the modernist beliefs. Modern designs should be against elitism, and of a neutral language, which does not discriminate against anyone. The school is an example of what modern life demanded, with everything from the workshops to the flats underneath one roof. It was a response to the new, faster pace of life.
The Bauhaus school had a big window made of re-enforced glass, a new material, so that each room had plenty of light allowing the artists to work in the best conditions. It may not seem like the most exciting piece of architecture, but is a prime example of form following function, meaning that the function is not disguised by the aesthetic.  This is the belief of Lois Sullivan who formulated the ‘law that form ever follows function.’ (Barnard 2005:114)
The building was made from concrete and steel, which at the time were new materials. The furniture was created in the workshops, many of the creations being a response to the new technology of the time, particularly transport.
There is a grid like structure in the design and placement of the windows on the structure. The spacing of the windows shows the modernist style of alignment, following a strict grid. It is a well-thought out piece of architectural design that aims to help the world’s progress.
Another value of modernism is that the designs would have a truth to materials, with the object being stripped down to its original form, making these pure materials speak for themselves, not needing to be changed into something they are not.  Josef Albers, a teacher at the Bauhaus, says that the artists must ‘exploit, not disguise the strengths inherent of the materials.’ (Withford 1994)
While the Universal font did not take off as a standardized worldwide font, the bold, simple but effective font Futura was designed for the logo of this building. Type faces were rethought with traditional fonts being discarded.
Similar to the idea behind the font Universal, because of the clear, simplicity of the design, the building was ideally supposed to be clear and ever-lasting. There is no sight of useless decoration, instead only what is needed is used; the result being that the beauty is in the simplicity.
                ‘Adolf Loos … argues that the ornamentation or decoration of objects is to be avoided, because it causes them to quickly go in and out of style.’ (Barnard: 2005:114)
A modernist belief was that it was only possible to create a new piece of design by inventing a new technique. The new font, new typeface and new style of architecture shows this modernist desire for the new, advancing and improving, not looking back at the old.
Modernist art and design was responding to both the positive and negative forces of modernity, continuing to use the new materials and new technologies that had become available to create a new style of non elitist art. The modernist artists had the good intention of continuing to helping to improve the world, and providing answers to problems created through the negative forces such as mass urbanisation and a faster pace of life. This belief is an ‘almost contradictory, but always accompanying, belief in progress.’ (Barnard 2005: 113)
The modernist’s response to the force of mass production may not seem like an adequate response, but a contradictory one, as it could be argued that the sense of the unique individual self was lost due to the forces of modernity.
Word Count:  1,583
Bibliography
Barnard, M. (2005), Graphic Design as Communication, 1st edn, Oxon: Routledge
Spencer, N (2001), Guggenheim Museum Collection A-Z, 2nd edn, New York: Guggenheim Museum Publications
Lupton, E and Miller, A (1999), Design Writing Research, 2nd edn, London: Phaidon Press Limited
Ambrose, G and Harris, P (2009), The Fundamentals of Graphic Design, 1st edn, Switzerland: AVA Publishing SA
Fiell, C and Fiell, P (2005), Graphic Design Now, 2nd edn, Cologne: Taschen
De Jong, C (2006), Sans Serif: The Ultimate Sourcebook of Classic and Contemporary Sans Serif Typography, London: Thames & Hudson
The Face of the Twentieth Century Bauhaus, (1994) [DVD] Written and narrated by Withford, F. UK: BBC/RM ARTS
Idea Finder (2005), Invention of the Automobile, [online] Available at: <http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/automobile.htm> [Accessed 22 January 2011]
Idea Finder (2006), Invention of the Telephone, [online] Available at: <http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/telephone.htm> [Accessed 22 January 2011]
Idea Finder (2006), Invention of the Airplane, [online] Available at: <http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/airplane.htm> [Accessed 22 January 2011]
Web Exhibits (2008), Daylight Saving Time, [online] Available at: <http://www.webexhibits.org/daylightsaving/d.html>[Accessed 22 January 2011]
Anysley, J (2005), Pioneers of Modern Graphic Design: A Complete History, [online] Available at: <http://www.davidmayer.co.uk/Bass/pioneer.html> [Accessed 24 January 2011]

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Deconstruction

The implications of deconstruction for thinking about text

Lecture Notes
  • Deconstrucion is complicating what seems to be obvious. It is a style of writing that you can never understand. It is an invented philosophy, which became like a 'style', that overlaps with traits of postmodernism graphics. The work of this style shouldn't be grouped together as an ism - as it is wrongly known as 'deconstructionism'. 
  • The Cranbook Academy of Art was a deconstructivist school which played with the rules of Graphic Design.
  • 'Deconstruction is an approach to texts which analyses their systems of representation - the systems which frame their communication' (Jacques Derrida I) Text refers to anything that gives meaning.
  • By questioning and interrogating you can unpick hidden structures that lie beneath the surface.
  • There was a traditional idea that speech was the primary method of communication as it is original, natural, internal, authentic and powerful. Writing was seen a secondary copy of speech, and therefore, deemed inferior. This is because is requires equipment, and the subject is absent. However, writing can last forever, whereas speech can't. Derrida deconstructs this idea that speech is better than writing.
  • When reading a text, you are reading the authors opinions, but with decisions from the designers getting in the way. There is more than one voice in a book, and the decisions behind why a certain font, why a certain kerning or leading has been used is communicated.
  • The way a designer sets out a page can stop you from reading everything, as they almost read it for you, indenting new paragraphs, separating different points, making it easy to skim through.
  • Designers add a voice which can become more important than what is written / readers voice. This is the death of the idea of the author being the only one who gives meaning.
  • Katherine McCoys book page (Cranbook Acadamey) is an example of deconstruction text. Opposites, such as art and science, are placed in between lines of text, so the reader has to read two things simultaneously. There is a split down the middle of the page, yet the text reads like a standard page, not in columns. You have to read it in a different way than to what the brain has been taught. This awakes the reader and makes them really pay attention.
  • The Cranbook Academy Journal makes you aware of the structure it deconstructs, as it takes standard accepted forms of journals and slowly changes them.
  • Deconstruction posters can attack conventions, by not following the rules of graphic design, but by giving the reader the power, by having no headings, no grid, removing structures and therefore allowing the reader to choose their own meaning to this style of poster.
  • Barry Deck's 'Template Gothic' is a font that deconstructs itself, as some letters are slanted and uneven. As the geometry is destroyed, when using this font for writing paragraphs, the text looks wobbly.
  • The unusual layout of David Carson's 'Ray Gun' deconstructs what is is to be a magazine. The pages of this magazine seem to be against communication, with anti-meaning.
  • In a critique of David Carson's work, the designer has used techniques of Carson's, which really makes you think why has he made this decision to do this and what does it mean?
  • Deconstruction architecture challenges what a modern building should be because we assume certain forms. (Peter Eisenman - Tokyo office block)
  • Bernard Tschumi's Le Parc de la Villette Paris is not like a standard park with a path that leads you a certain way around, but is confusing, like a maze, making the visitor have to think for themselves. This shows how deconstruction architecture can be anti-authority.
  • Daniel Libeskind's Jewish Museum in Berlin has no straight walls, and is a building that dismantles itself.
  • Typographers can change the message as much meaning is created by us as with the text.
  • Books used to be handwritten so every copy was slightly different. Typography standardised books so there is only one meaning.
  • The kerning and leading affects the meaning of how a sentence is read. The font choice changes what is being communicated.
  • Beatrice Warde 'The Crystal Goblet' thinks that type should be invisible as the authors words are the most important.
  • Example: The Sex Pistols album artwork is against order, as it goes against what the rules of good typography are. It is modern, but anti-aesthetic. It seeks to critique the modern world in a political way.
Task

Summarise the main points of the text about typography and the role of typography in communication, then analyse one piece of deconstructionist graphic design.

 Text from Lupton, E (2008) 'Thinking with Type'
  • Typography helps readers to avoid reading by allowing them to skim through and skip parts of the text to find just what they are looking for. Paragraphs, marked by indents, make it clear that a new idea has begun.
  • Before print, books were handwritten, and there were errors in each copy, but now there is only one form of the text. However, if a book was to be translated or revised etc, it would change. Online texts are easily downloadable, allowing the reader to change them.
  • As the alphabet represents sounds, spacing and punctuation is vital for the text to be read as speech.
  • Books have navigational features, such as page numbers and headings, so a reader knows their location. This is useful so the reader can leave the text and return to it. This is seen as an "attack on linearity", which may be celebrated, however, electronic screens are usually linear. 
  • The reader can create meaning as much as the writer. (Barthes theory of death of the author). This is because the content of the text changes when the physical representation of the text is altered, giving the power to the designer.
  • Readers on the web are impatient. This arises from culture, as people have different expectations of the text they will find on a website compared to in print. Therefore people pay more attention to print, even though it is as easy to read.
David Carson (Year of article unknown), Ray Gun - Double page spread
http://theslick.jugem.jp/?eid=69

This double page spread from David Carson's magazine about style and music, Ray Gun, is an example of famous deconstructionist graphic design. There are so many layers to this spread, containing many different fonts, colours and images that everything looks like a jumble, a random experiment which looks like a mistake, but at the same time, works, and therefore Carson's graphic design 'style' is still celebrated today. The text in the columns is so tiny, and there is so much going out, that the articles are almost impossible to read. The viewer could either choose to ignore this work, or decide to scrutinise it; either way this style of graphic design definitely provokes a reaction, with viewers either loving or hating Carson's work. As the style of graphic design is innovative and experimental, readers may be more likely to pick up this magazine, as it is interesting and evokes curiosity, than they would pick up an article which is just plain black text on white paper. The columns do not seem to fit into a neat grid as the columns on other magazines do. Carson seems to do the opposite to what the rules of graphic design are, yet he gets away with it, is even celebrated for this. By making decisions such as to have red text on a black background, allowing the colours to bleed into one another, or to have a mix of different type faces which do not seems to match, or the text that wanders off the page, Carson is going against the modern order of design. Although the text is almost illegible, the page does communicate to the reader, however, it is more about design, rather than the actual subject of the article. It suggests that the designers are more important than the authors, as they give a new meaning to the text. Carson even said that he believed 'if the type is invisible, so is your article'. This idea relates to Barthes theory of the 'Death of the author'. 

Extra Reading

Joe Clark (1995) 'Illegible David Carson cannot 'not' communicate'
http://joeclark.org/design/davidcarson.html

Lupton, E and Miller, A (1999) Design Writing Research 'Deconstruction and Graphic Design', 2nd Edition, New York: Phaidon

Post-modernist Graphic Design

What is Post-Modernist Graphic Design?
To begin with, here are some qualities of post-modernist graphic design:

Central features summarised by Thomas & Walsh
*Globalisation
*A post-industrial world of consumption and communication
*The challenging of cultural values and difference - (old social/cultural identities have lost their values, semiotics are not applied, things just exist without judgement)
Other features
*The meaning of a piece has to be made by the reader, and each reader will find a different meaning, as designs are visually ambiguous (deconstruction of meaning)
*Ignoring the rules of graphic design, there are no rules
*Past styles/images/type from art and design history are 'borrowed' and used again at graphic designs convenience, as everything has been done before (exhaustion of styles)
*The end of original art - things are reproducible, mass production has replaced hand made
*A jokey, fun, light-hearted attitude has replaced the seriousness
*Eclectic mix of styles
*Complexity and chaos in designs

There appear to be some qualities of post-modernism that are shared with the qualities of modernism, however, on the other hand, post-modernism is the complete opposite of some of the associations given to modernism. Post-modernism provides negative/sarcastic responses to the characteristics of modernism which are seen as being bad.

It is difficult to conclude exactly what post-modernist graphic design is, as everything is so vague, but here are five examples:


Memphis Group (1981) - New International Style
http://www1.yoox.com/item.asp/YOOX/ELECTA/dept/accessorieswomen/tskay/3FD17CD7/rr/1/cod10/56000736FV/sts/sr_accessorieswomen80


The Memphis Group are an influential group of post-modernist designers, known for their brightly shocking furniture designs in a variety of interesting shapes. This book cover announces the new post-modern style. Their work is light-hearted, and their fun approach can be seen on this cover, that features a miss-match of many different shapes, such as with their furniture. There appears to be a structure with this design, but then there are certain aspects that break the rules, such as the red text placed off-centre, and the pattern on the left which is not aligned as the other shapes/patterns are. While the colour is simple, with the use of shapes there is a lot going on in this design, and, like with the Memphis group's furniture designs, it challenges the boring designs that are out there.





John Weber (1984) - Flyer
http://gds.parkland.edu/gds/!lectures/history/1975/postmodern.html

This flyer by John Weber relates to the post-modernist theory that everything has been done before, by using the shapes and colours which were used in the designs of the constructivist movement. However, the font used is quite different to the style of typography using in constructivist graphic design, showing a mix of styles. The design ignores the rules of grid and layout, with things placed diagonally, making the text harder to read, as everything is a bit chaotic. The use of only two colours against a lot of negative space should make this image look neat and simple, but instead, there is a complexity to the design. It is quite hard to understand what this flyer is actually about, leaving the viewer to find their own meaning.



Seymour Chwast (published 2004) - A Quarter Century of Innovative Design and Illustration
http://www.designishistory.com/1960/seymour-chwast

Again, this book cover shows how post-modernist graphic designers can bring up old styles and re-use them for light-hearted, interesting, but not original, designs. This illustration has been created in the style of pop art designs, which were considered at the time to be jokey, and there is definitely humour intended in this image of a hen wearing a tux. The fonts used are also based on past styles of typography, a style different to what was used in pop art designs, showing an eclectic mix, which ignores the rules of things having to work together for a particular meaning.


Wolfgang Weingart (1980-91) - Didacta Eurodidac
http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A6289&page_number=8&template_id=1&sort_order=1

This is quite a busy, complex piece, but it doesn't look too over crowded due to the limited colour scheme, and the use of only one font. The heavy use of lines does seem to give this piece a grid, but at the same time, the rules have been broken, with little negative space and the overlaying of a miss-match of different sized images, this piece ends up quite chaotic.  


April Greiman (1986) - Does it make sense?
http://www.idsgn.org/posts/design-discussions-april-greiman-on-technology/

This is another busy piece, containing many different layers of a mix of different styles of images and type, which seem to be quite randomly placed, making a chaotic piece, that does not appear to follow a grid. It breaks the rules of graphic design, meaning that what is being communicated isn't completely clear, so the viewer has to make their own mind up. The type is quite small in contrast to the images, and some text is even reversed, making it even harder to read. Also, some images are upside down. The randomness of an image of an upside down dinosaur placed on top of the body of a naked woman gives this design humour, and while it is confusing and ambiguous, it does seem fun and light-hearted.

Extra Reading

Janviere, J (2009) A Brief History of 20th Century Graphic Design,
http://www.slideshare.net/JenniferJanviere/a-brief-history-of-20th-century-graphic-design

Parkland College Graphic Design (2010) Post Modernism,
http://gds.parkland.edu/gds/!lectures/history/1975/postmodern.html


Barnard, M. (2005), Graphic Design as Communication, 1st edn, Oxon: Routledge


Appignanesi, R and Garratt, C. (1999), Introducing Postmodernism, 2nd edn, Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty. Ltd

Tuesday, 1 February 2011

Defining the Avant-Garde

Seminar Notes
  • Avant-garde art is deeply aligned to the modernist way of practice as it aims to be progressive. It is used as a quality to describe work as well as being a group you can be a member of. The term is now popular, but used so much in the wrong context it has become meaningless. Google web searches prove this. Avant-garde art seeks to shock, challenge and re assess conventions. It is the development of the individual expressive self.
  • Duchamp's urinal mocks the elitism in art. It is shocking, new and innovative. It is anti-conventional and so challenges what art is in an aggressive way. It is non conformist as he re-defines what art is rather than sticking to the rules.
  • The Fauves 'wild beasts' were given their title by art critiques who were disgusted by their work as it contains new techniques, bright colours and bold brush strokes. It is unrealistic in this aspect but the subject matter is real. Classical art often contain fantasy scenes which aren't real. There are examples of classical art created in the modern period which were seen as realistic due to the traditional methods behind them.
  • There is a hierarchy of the disciplines of art in society. Fine art is more valued, as it is believed to be creative, intellectual and socially important.
  • In the LCA prospectus it can be seen that each course considers it has aspects of avant-garde in it. How relevant is avant-garde to graphic design? Answering a specific question set on a brief may not be being original.
  • In art education students are taught to copy other artists styles, giving the modern illusion of individuality. In historical art education, the students were taught to copy 'master' artists work/styles before being able to create their own.
  • Fine art is as commercial as graphic design, as the reason behind the artist creating the piece is so someone will buy it/ they have been commissioned. There is nothing 'genius' about this.
  • There is an attitude with contemporary art that if you don't understand it is your fault for not being clever enough. The painting 'Death of Chatterton' tells a story of a poet who kills himself as he can't sell his poetry because the world doesn't understand him. This is the myth of the romantic tortured genius. It is as if society is responsible for his death. To be avant-garde you should be better than/ahead of society, so it could be a good thing that the world didn't understand Chatterton.
  • The 'Stonebreakers' painting is avant-garde in a different way - it looks traditional yet its subject matter is political, seeking to make social change. Instead of being a painting of royalty or religion, it features the working class.
  • Clive Bell came up with a self-protecting critical idea that successful art would contain 'signifcant form' - which is the relations and combinations of lines and colours, which when organised give the power to move someone aesthetically. If you do not see the significant form in paintings that Bell does, he protects his idea by accusing of not being educated enough.
  • 'Art for art's sake' refers to art that has no political meaning, it just abstract or aesthetic. Pollocks 'Lavender mist' experimental painting is a symbol of elitism in western culture. To be truly experimental, you run the risk of no one understanding your work, which is elitist. So how true can avant-garde be?
  • Stalin disagreed with this 'snobby' art. He only like a particular style (he banned constructivism) which was used to get a message across, but which could be seen as propaganda. Which is better?
  • Avant-garde was originally a french military term. It culturally means that artists are cutting edge, leading the way in either aesthetic or political ways.
  • Kitsch is the idea that something is in bad taste, tacky, but has love ability in a patronising way. This value of judgement is based on a system of taste which is an elitist thing to do. 'Kitsch' things aspire to be art, but fail, as they can't be taken seriously. It depends on cultural standards. To say it is kitsch to have a famous print in a frame or on a plate as one can't afford the real thing is like saying there is a place for art - either the gallery or for collectors - and this is elitist. Examples of kitsch: turning a piece of art into something it is not supposed to be; distorting an existing piece of art to fit in a certain space; 'fine art' paintings of tigers, also sentimental commemoration items such as for the royal wedding.
  • Jeff Koons created a life size model of Michael Jackson and a monkey; there is an illusion this piece is art because it is in a recognised gallery and made by a famous artist. People are told it is important, but if it were found in an ordinary shop it would be regarded as junk.
  • Pop art is an art form which is not original, but is against elitism.
  • Communication is not as important in avant-garde art, it is more important for the piece to be experimental than to be understood.
  • By saying that something is an example of bad typography you run the risk of sounding elitist.
  • The Tate do not want traditional art that the public like, but do want avant-garde pieces, like Carl Andre's 'Equivalent VIII', which was literally a pile of bricks. People visiting have to be told why it is important as it is not understandable.
  • Only a select few people decide who the winner of the Turner Prize is, these people have the authority to decide which artist the public like.
  • Two men were arrested for jumping on Tracey Emin's bed, seemingly trying to out avant-garde her.
  • Damien Hurst had the idea behind his shark but didn't actual do anything to make it/pay for it, so why is he the creative genius? Values of taste are political. Re-productions of Hurst's work aren't even made by him, but still sell, as they are a status symbol for the rich.
  • Hurst's skull 'For the Love of God' was also made by someone else. The value behind it is monetary not artistic.
  • The reasons for an auction of post-impressionist art pieces going for prices around $80 million dollars were corrupt - part of a Japanese money laundering scam in the late 1980's.
  • Adverts by ad busters are more likely to cause social change and be avant-garde than Tracey Emin's 'art'.
Discussion
  
(Discuss the concept of avant-garde in relation to 2 works of Graphic Design. Could look at constructivism, ad busters, post-modernism - all have different attitudes in society)

Image One:
Adbusters (1996) Absolut Impotence
http://67.192.229.58/content/absolut-impotence
Image Two:
Rodchenko, A (1925) Lengiz books on all subjects
http://www.adbusters.org/content/alexander-rodchenko


Adbusters spoof campaigns could be seen as being avant-garde, as they are aiming to be progressive, and change the way people think by making them look at an advert in a different way. This image, which is part of a series, mocks the style of the official absolut vodka adverts, but with a clever twist. This could mean that the adverts aren't actually original, but the message behind them is, as other adverts are simply selling their products, or a way of life that supposedly comes with a product. This set of adverts reveal the negatives that come with drinking vodka, to deter people away from buying it. This is re-assessing conventions, by challenging the adverts that already exist through telling the other side to the story.

Constructivism was such an original, shocking, new movement that Stalin banned it, only allowing the style of art he wanted to be used. He thought this style was dangerous and against communism. Constructivism shocked due to how different it was to the traditional fine art pieces that came before it, instead it was radical and experimental. The wedge shape used in this photo montage by Rodchenko, as well as many other pieces of constructivist graphic design is a symbol of smashing the old regime, as the Russian people took over the government. Not only do these pieces impress on an aesthetic level, they also contain a political message.

I do think that these two graphic design pieces are avant-garde, but for totally different reasons than why fine art would be classed as avant-garde. Graphic design can cause social change for the better, whereas fine art pieces seem to hold different qualities, as they aren't understandable, suggesting the artists believe they are ahead of society. Yet this seems like a snobby, elitist quality, which is not progressive in the ways graphic design is. Graphic design is a means of communication and therefore it is important the pieces are understandable.

Thursday, 6 January 2011

Bauhaus Research

Modernity Essay Research

These are the two images that I will discuss in my essay.
First image:
Bayer, H (1925), 'Universal' Typeface
Second image:
Gropius, W (1925), Bauhaus School - Dessau

These are notes I have made from watching a Bauhaus educational DVD
Withford, F (1994), The Face of the Twentieth Century Bauhuas, DVD: BBC / RM ARTS
  • The Bauhaus achieved something different to other art schools at the time, as it had a way of dealing with life on an aesthetic level
  • Walter Grobius' dream became a reality with the creation of the Bauhaus school
  • It was born out of catastrophe, as the old world was collapsing after the 1st world war
  • Bauhaus means building house
  • Constructive thinking and revolutionary ideas were thought up at the Bauhaus
  • Teachers at the school wanted to return to crafts, and so there were workshops where the students actually made things, taught by master craftsman. This was a major innovation at the time.
  • There was a Bohemian atmosphere
  • Teachers wanted to "destroy separations" between the arts
  • Students learnt about materials and textures rather than just art history
  • The Bauhaus invented the modern art student, unique work was created rather than just copies of traditional styles
  • Products, everything from kitchenware to toys, were made with function and the mass market in mind
  • The emphasis was on colour and geometry - the triangle, circle and square
  • Teach Joesph Albers says the artists must "exploit, not disguise the strengths inherent of the materials"
  • Students were taught to think intelligently and clearly rather than like mad artists
  • The 2nd Bauhaus home was in Dessau, and was designed by Gropius himself. Advanced construction techniques were used, and new materials, steel, concrete and re-enforced glass were used.
  • Everything was under one roof, the canteen, the workshops, the flats and the offices
  • It was built in just over one year
  • The school is a perfect example of constructivism and what modern life demanded
  • The furniture in the building was all created in the workshops, and many of the creations were inspired by the new technology of the time, in particular the transport
  • The typography was bright, bold and simple. Typefaces were rethought and traditional solutions were ignored. 
  • The Bauhaus was often hated because it was "different", "radical" and "scary"
  • The school moved to different locations for political reasons. The 3rd Bauhaus was closed in 1933 by the Nazi's. 

Wednesday, 8 December 2010

Introducing Post-Modernism

  • With post modernism there is a feeling that everything has been done before, there are no original ideas, instead ideas are recycled and re quoted.
  • Late modernism was born out of optimism, with a view to improving peoples lives, but the rules of modernism actually limited people, preventing individuality.
  • Modernism was experimental, looked forwards, was original and meant for the individual to advance society.
  • Post modernism is almost the complete opposite to the associations linked with modernism. Progress is doubted, while a jokey light-hearted attitude replaces seriousness. It is impossible to be original.
  • The new modern world is seen as a bad route, as people are fed up with technology.
  • The new hasn't saved us, but made our lives worse.
  • Post modernism is fundamentally related to modernism, as it is often a negative or sarcastic reaction to the characteristics of the modern world, where modernism is an expression of these.
  • This crazy construction (Homage to New York) is anti-aesthetic, against modernism, however, it could be argued that there is a truth to materials with the junk. It was a work of art that was designed to blow up and destroy itself, which relates to the idea of new technologies destroying New York.
  • Post modernism is thought of as starting in the 1960's
  • Jameson thinks we are in late modernism, and that capitalism is about to fall
  • Hip hop is an example of post modern music. It is an eclectic mix, a strange modern mash up hybrid. It contains samples of old with new beats.
  • The idea of a global village started with modernism, now everything is linked, so the idea of an individual nationality is lost
  • The Pruitt building was bulldozed. It was a social housing project with modernist design. It was based on modernist society values. However, it quickly became a ghetto, rife with crime, drugs and prostitution, rather than building a community. It was a failed Utopian project.
  • Post modernism believes that modernism got it wrong, and failed us.
  • Technological determinism proved to be wrong, not everything is improved with new technology. This is proved by the Internet, while it has brought people together, it has also allowed for fraud, pedophiles and crime.
  • Post modernism is not all negative, it realises that everyone is unique, and everyone should have their own voice. There is a cultural space where new directions can be opened.
  • Society starts to get confused and lost with the dizzying array of options
  • The international style of architecture is shown in New York. Every skyscraper is true to form following function.
  • Park Hill flats in Sheffield are an example of the modernist community, with an aggressive aesthetic. They became slums, but cannot be demolished because the government say that the flats are important examples of modernist architecture. Post modernists have a 'colourful' solution to beautify the flats.
  • The AT&T building is an example of post modern architecture. It is an irregular skyscraper, mixing the old with the new. The part at the top references the Greek temples.
  • Post modernist architecture is more human, fun, less serious and individual.
  • Classical references are updated in a modern way. In this example, the skyscraper grid is turned wobbly and wavy. The building seems to be falling apart although it is brand new. There is bright colour. It is a mix of seriousness with joking.
  • Prince Charles dislikes modernist architecture and shows bad examples in his book.
  • Leeds magistrate court is an example of ill thought out post modern architecture, which just looks tired and ugly.
  • Leeds College of Art building is another example. The exposed pipework inside is a reference to the industrial culture.
  • People now realise that the modernist belief system was lies, as it was never the whole world's vision, but an elitist unattainable ideology.
  • Post modernism is an undermining of the structures that have guided us in the past. Without that foundation, people are left confused with a mess of a society. This allows for individual narratives and sub-cultures.
  • Pop art is often attacked for not being serious. There are jokey examples of the proposed Utopian future. "This must be the place." - An example of a piece that is sarcastic rather than celebratory.
  • People have no idea what is high or low culture anymore.
  • Las Vegas is the destruction of modern vision. Modernists would be distraught, post modernists would celebrate.
  • Dystopia - an ultimate loss of order and self. Failure of human progress.
  • Warhol is an example of the artist being replaced by celebrity. He was not about creativity, his art was an attack on what it means to be artistic. For example, the Marilyn's contained mistakes and smudges but were still used.
  • Pollock painted on to canvas with expression, emotion and gesture. Warhol has a jokey attack on this style by weeing on a canvas.
  • Piero Manzoni has a jokey attack on the art world with his "Artist's Shit", which is literally him selling his poo in a can.
  • Art seems superficial, all about the money. Everything seems to only have surface value, with no deeper emotional meaning.
  • Advertising has a greater social effect in the post modernist era than fine art.
  • People are now defined by material things rather than any greater sense.
  • Post modernist artists are about mixing high brown and populist.
  • The Memphis Group are a group of post modernist graphic designers. Their work is a mix of silliness with modernist styles, such as sans serif typography.
  • David Shrigley's drawings are a jokey attack on art today.
  • Modernism was always only about the Western world.
  • It is difficult to conclude post modernism, as everything is so vague.

Wednesday, 1 December 2010

New Media & Visual Culture

  • Emergence of new technologies
  • Before the invention of the Internet, McLuhan said that the world is now like a village, connected by mass communication
  • In 1450 printing techniques developed, so that people didn't have to print only using wood blocks. Printed material slowly becomes available to masses
  • Newspapers and books become a circulation of knowledge and information
  • Computers become vehicles for the consumption and production of material. They have changed the way we exist, and the way we engage with information
  • Will the 'reader' be the end of books?
  • You can now read newspaper stories online, which contain forums so people can discuss the article, and challenge it. There is a shift in power from the editor to the reader.
  • New technology is democratic, allowing us to shape and change the information we receive
  • There is a false sense of freedom and control with this new technology, where you can get lost in the hyperspace information
  • Several senses are stimulated with hypermedia, but there are hazards, as too much on the page can be dizzying
  • Books force us to engage in a way that the Internet doesn't, as you can so easily skip through with hyperlinks
  • A small group of people control the information given out to a large amount of people on a web page
  • A con with new this is that there is no presence between the communicator and audience, it depersonalises the experience
  • Also, new technology allows for superficiality, such as 'reality' programmes such as X factor
  • TV Voting gives the illusion of control
  • Viewer call ins seem as if there is true interaction, but in reality, producers can cut off the caller whenever they want
  • There are pro's with new technology too - more people can access information now it is mass spread
  • It is democratic, also it means art is no longer elitist
  • The Benetton campaign traded on images of unity, black and white people together, horror, clothes of shot solider, exposing HIV. The adverts are not socially controlling, they are more about politics than advertising.
  • Leeds 13 Scam - A group of art students pretended that they used their university grant for a drinking holiday and leaked the story to a newspaper. They used mass media to gain status.
  • Pollock's art is about aesthetic freedom, not about politics and without an agenda. However, there is a conspiracy story that the CIA paid him to paint these images that gave the illusion of independence in art to show Russia that capitalism was best.
  • Picasso used and exploited mass media
  • Lichtenstein made comic book images, which were regarded as a lesser form of art, sophisticated. He presented this art form to the elitist.
  • There was a backlash against pop art, it was criticised with the mass media, as pop art was a challenge to the elitist value system.
  • Warhol's prints of Marilyn Monroe are not just pop art images of the famous celebrity, there is much more to them. He has used her as a commodity, as she was represented as being like a product. The print of the Marilyn's is the same style as Warhol's print of Coca Cola bottles - another commodity. The colours used in the Marilyn print aren't realistic art colours, as this image is anti aesthetic.
  • Once repeated, shocking images lose their value. Repetition causes indifference.

Tuesday, 30 November 2010

Critical Positions on Advertising

  • In Britain there are around 25 million print adverts a year
  • Adverts demand that we buy something to gain status in society
  • With some products you are not just buying into the brand but a lifestyle. For example, Mac vs. PC - Mac's are hundreds of pounds more expensive than PCs, but seem cooler and more creative. The logo makes it obvious that you are part of this Mac lifestyle. Another example is with Starbucks coffee, it is majorly overpriced, but people buy it, as there is a certain lifestyle that accompanies buying into this brand.
  • It is impossible to escape away from advertising, we are bombarded with promises for better lives, which makes us unhappy with our own life. These adverts instruct and persuade, and their influence within the Western world cannot be denied. Times Square is an example of this, with there being adverts in every direction you look.
  • They are an integrated part of our lives as you can't get away from them, for example there are adverts and pop-ups all over the Internet.
  • The commodity culture we are in artificially makes us feel closer with people that have the same interests, wear the same clothes etc. These commodities allow people to express themselves, or the ideal of themselves.
  • What we buy is what we are. People seem not to be judged on their skills or qualities but their commodities (things that are designed to be sold). Because of these commodities, our self worth has changed. Clothes, holidays, house, furnishings, electronics, technology and transport can all be used to show status. (Conspicuous consumption)
  • With old advertising, commodities were sold based on their virtues.
  • When advertising changes, a dream is being sold instead of the qualities of the product. (Uncle Sam Range Cooker advert).
  • Contemporary adverts can contain lots of connotations. CK1 perfume advert connotes beauty, sexiness, popularity, youth, belonging, multi-racial relationships, sophisticated sexuality (note the model has shaved hair - there is no nod towards a dumb blond model stereotype). We are fooled into believing that buying a bottle of this perfumed water will make us cooler, popular etc.
  • Commodities have to be advertised, as we don't actually need the products, so we need to be tricked into buying them or they wouldn't sell.
  • John Berger on advertising (YouTube Video) -We buy products to make us feel richer, where in reality they make us poorer
  • The people we think we need to be are projected to us on billboards, giving us the idea that we can become better people through consumption
  • Advertising provokes envy as we think we need to be these 'fantasy' people. We feel we can't afford not to be glamorous. This is a trap which is ultimately making us poorer.
  • Commodity culture perpetuates false needs - aesthetic innovation - e.g. we would buy a 'better' kettle because of its looks. e.g. we already have enough clothes, but we are convinced we need more - this becomes an addiction
  • Newer things create false needs - e.g. when a new version of the Ipod comes out the old versions are not cool. The desire to keep spending is a peculiar desire.
  • Planned obsolescence - companies know when to release products so they are most desirable. Things aren't made to last, but made to break as soon as the guarantee is over, so that you have to buy a new one. Companies do have the power and knowledge to make better products. (Death of a Salesman - Play about this)
  • The reality of a product is not shown in an advert, for example, with Nike products, the reality is that the item is made in a sweatshop in a foreign country, where the workers are paid slave labour prizes. In the adverts, the products were worn by powerful women.
  • Reification is a byproduct of commodity fetishism. It is when things you buy almost become a person, such as in the car advert where the family are hugging the car. It allows objects to become human yet humans are simplified into categories, almost becoming objects themselves - such as 'emos'.
  • The role of the model is like the role of the goddess. The model is the unattainable idea of perfection.
  • Commodities show status, just like how collections of art used to.
  • Advertising is beneficial to the economy. It encourages business and growth. It allows for creative and radical innovations. It challenges stereotypes.
  • Yet advertising can distort language skills, as it has to communicate to the audience in a simple, reductive way.

Wednesday, 24 November 2010

Advertising and New Media

Old Media
  • Hesker Lever is pointed to as the pioneer of advertising. He was one half of the Lever Brothers - now Unilever - a company which manages over 900 brands
  • In 1851, Britain was a superpower, it was the richest country in the world (it is now the 4th) and had the largest empire in the world
  • In 1860, Britain began to print, and mechanically fill boxes
  • The modern shop Lush reverts back to what soap was sold like - cut into slabs and stamped
  • The main revenue for advertising was newspapers (now google is a big competitor)
  • In the 1890's, better quality colour printing allowed for mass production
  • Lever started buying contemporary paintings to use in his advertisements. At the time, when an image was bought, the buyer owned the copyright. He picked paintings of children and items of white linen. These images now seem old-fashioned but were modern at the time.
  • The bride painting contains different generations of women and lots of white, ideal for a soap advert.The painting was edited so that the soap could feature. The idea is that the children can see that their mothers use Sunlight soap to keep clothes white, so the children should do it when they grow up. It suggests that happiness will come with this too.
  • Unilever the company is still involved with contemporary art, each year sponsoring at the Tate.
  • Lever was one of the richest men in the world
  • Sunlight was the first international advertising campaign, telling people that they needed the product
  • Lever Brothers was the first firm to hold promotional events, having a competition and a day out to advertise the soap
  • They even had a royal endorsement, making them the soap makers for Queen Victoria, and started a collection scheme, where customers could save the wrappers in exchange for gifts. This is a common scheme now.
  • Paintings were often of middle class scenes containing children. The posters were targeted at mothers as the brand wanted lifetime loyalty.
  • Lever took over soap companies from all over the world. He spent £2 million on advertising in the first 20 years.
  • There was a sinister side to Lever, he was an advocate for forced labour. He made slaves extract palm oil for the soap, but the advertisements didn't show this side of the picture, instead only showing lovely images of palm trees.
  • Lever caused discussions and debates with new art forms.
  • Lever was a liberal capitalist so avoided placing advertisements in left-wing papers. He was choosy where he advertised, and wanted good stock.
  • John Hegarty of BBH is another pioneer of advertising, he said that advertising is telling the truth, but making it interesting.
  • Working class women were the audience for Lever's advertisements. They were hard workers and so they aged quickly. The advertisements tried to advertise that the soap would make life easier, leaving quality time for romance, and also to make sure that you wouldn't age as quickly. Advertisers wouldn't get away with saying something like "why do women age much quicker than men?" nowadays.
  • Even the brand Dove (a Unilever brand) uses the strategy of brand loyalty today. They suggest that a mother is responsible for a daughters beauty.
  • Britishness was used as a mark for quality and success on products
  • The advertisers had a clear message, aiming to point out personal hygiene, and this made sales rocket. This strategy is used in the advertisement for the men's brand Lynx today (another Unilever brand.)
  • People began to study the psychology of advertising, as some believed they needed these products to be better.
  • To help advertise, there were celebrity endorsements and soap companies even sponsored soap operas on the radio.
  • The soap company held a promotional event where children could carve soap figures. This strategy was analyzed with psychology.
  • Advertising was criticized by left-wingers during the war.  It was believed to be wrong, evil and morally corrupt.
  • Economic Liberals - Admass believed that advertising was better for everyone
New Media
  • In the last decade there has been a shift, and many ads now involve audience
  • Communication is not just one way, it is circular now the audience are engaged
  • Advertisements based on technology
  • Voluntary advertisements (watching online) vs. forced (TV/print)
  • Trevor Beattie - "Lots of small ideas grow to big ones"
  • The YouTube video containing experiment show with diet coke and mentos had nothing to do with either company, but advertising became worth $10 million to mentos
  • Advertising now talking with instead of to an audience
  • The Old Spice adverts are pass around virals, replying to requests on their twitter account (marriage proposal)
  • Oasis new album release advertised by New York street artists performing selected tracks, buzz on streets, news, Internet, even a documentary was made
  • YouTube video awards now exist, growing areas are social issues and charities
Mobile Phones
  • Mobile phones are changing the future of advertising with their apps
  • Giant Hydra company - artists collaborate not compete, people from all over the world help each other with a project

An Introduction to Semiotics

Seminar notes
  • Linguistics is a social science of signs giving meaning. Semiotics is understanding deeper meaning to normalised codes in society.
  • Almost everything in society gives meaning, forming a code, as its based on a complicated structure of shared consensus
  • Society has agreed that sounds and letters placed together make a word. Nothing is actually linked between letters and their meaning.
  • Images communicate to us - image 1 (rappers) and image 2 (punk style man) are a challenge to image 3 (a man in a suit) The suit is seen to be professional and smart. It is an unwritten cultural code, an agreed system of meaning. Everyone understands this social system even if they don't acknowledge it. Another example is that a tie has no use, is in no way practical, instead is just an item of clothing giving away meaning, communicating the idea of sophistication.
  • A dog could be called anything, why a dog? If it was called a woofer, it would make the most sense, regarding to the noise a dog makes.
  • Anything that gives meaning is a sign - gestures, clothes, sounds etc
  • Signifier = sound, image Signified = mental concept
  • There is no real logical connection between the signifier and the signified, just a socially given meaning.
  • An image of a rose is a signifier. And the sound of the word rose. What is being signified is a Rose. More can be read from the image, red roses symbolise love and passion. The relationship between these is arbitury.
  • Fonts are signifier. Sexist cliches about women can be shown with femine girly fonts.
  • There is a code that a certain font signifies a certain thing. If these clashed, cultural codes would be disturbed. For example, comic sans is known as a children's font. Sans serif fonts show modernism. A flowerly font is not modern.
  • The signified is broken down into two levels. Denotation is the simple direct surface meaning. Connotation is the deeper symbolic meaning. These are socially coded, taught to you by society.
  • Image denotes landscape. It is an advert trying to sell whisky. This image connotes peace, relaxation, tranquility, happiness, togetherness. The advert relies on tapping into cultural codes. It creates a mythic idea of Scotland, which is the birthplace of whisky. The setting being Scotland shows the brand is authentic. This means that the image is connotating history and tradition. It also connotes urban life and sophistication through the modern sofa the couple are sat on. This is a paradox to the connotations of country life.
  • Myth is the deepest level of connotation. It is dangerous and problomatic. People understand myth as natural meaning rather than socially given.
  • This image from a popular culture magazine denotes a young black soldier saluting the french flag, and connotes that all people are equal under the french flag regardless of colour.
  • The painting by Constable - The Haywain (1821) represents the myth of Englishness, green and pleasant land, harmony with natural and peaceful landscapes. There is also the myth of the English peasant, happily working the lands. In reality, this image was painted at a time of mass rioting, but the scene in the painting is now seen as reality rather than pure fiction.
  • St George's flag is a signifier. Different sides are being signified, from strength and unity to tea, rain and bowler hats.
  • Waving an England flag at a football game actually signifies more than just being a fan of football.
  • In the Wonderbra adverts, they are speaking in a language they think the women will understand, they are not intentionall trying to offend women, instead just going along with what culture agrees on. The text 'Double Major' is used on the infamous bra advert, a term suggesting that someone has done really well academically. However, the women's version of this term is suggested a meaning that a women has done well if she is a sexual object. This goes along with the historic myth that women are stupid, so have to sexualise themselves to achieve.
  • This advert for a birth control that only has to be thought about 4 times a year unintentionally makes the woman sounds stupid, lazy, forgetful etc.
  • This is a magazine article with the title 'Dressing your I.Q.' suggesting that you can look more intelligent through what clothes you wear.
  • The Hans Memling (1485) painting 'Vanity' shows the women as a stupid vain character, as she stares at herself in a mirror. Yet she is nude, as the man painting the image has sexualised the woman.
  • There are fonts which are known as Hawaiian or Greek fonts, showing the mythic idea of foreigners and labelling the other
  • A Chinese restaurant with a sign saying "No! We no see cat of yours no more ask please" taps into the racist stereotype in an attempt to get people into the restaurant.
  • P.C. Plod patrols Toy town (Noddy). He is fat, silly, friendly, jovial and not serious. This codes you into a way of thinking about the police - a constructed myth.
  • P.C. Wiggum patrols Springfield (Simpsons). He is lazy and greedy but ultimately harmless.
  • Actual police photograph. Signifies order, violence, that the police are just faceless robotic operatives of the law.
  • Original photograph of student smashing window at NUS march in London against tuition fees. Same image used on cover of 9 newspapers, with different headlines showing different opinions and sides to this story.
Applying semiotics to newspaper article
Article, Daily Mirror, 23.11.10 'Suicidal'


Now that I have been introduced to semiotics, I have applied what I have learnt to a newspaper article about ConDem cuts meaning that al-Qaeda followers may not be properly supervised after leaving prison.

Signifier - The image is a signifier, the words are signifiers, the colour is a signifier
Signified - 'Taliban fanatics' are signified in the image. The signified is broken down into what is dennoted, and what is connoted.
Denotes - The basic understanding of the people in the photographs is that they are Islamic, due to what they are wearing. The basic understanding through the title is that of death.
Connotes - The use of red connotes blood, violence, suffering and pain. This use of red has been placed on the word 'cuts' to connote cuts to mean physical pain as well as referring to spending cuts. The large, bold, uppercase text 'SUICIDAL' connotes fear, urgency and worry. By placing 'SUICIDAL' next to an photograph of Muslims, it connotes that these Muslims are suicide bombers. The word 'fanatics' in the sub-heading connotes the Muslims in the image to be crazy. These are the symbols that have been taught by society.
Myth - Through the headings placed next to the image, this article could be seen as following the myth that you should be scared of the actions of people of other religions. This myth is dangerous and problomatic, as many people who don't know much about Islam will form opinions from this socially given meaning.

Wednesday, 17 November 2010

The Document

  • Documentary photography was the biggest form of photography practice in the 20th century
  • The medium gained power, transcended painting as supposedly captures the truth
  • It is believed to be objective
  • There was the idea was that photographic evidence is neutral and not to be questioned
  • But also the idea that the photography was to document for the purpose of changing the world, to record and relay information
  • Camera with a conscious - not just there to record but to expose (James Nachtwey)
  • Because everyone can't see the pain of war, photography is there to show them images
  • Here the photographer is not disinterested, is not invisible, but instead is making a stance, being overtly subjective with a political humanist agenda. He is attempting to expose war the benefit of humanity. He is struggling for the people, which gets rid of the idea of photography being neutral
  • The world is being closed in on itself by showing how the 'other' half live through photography
  • Bonds are created between subject, audience and photographer
  • The photographer seeks to align, and to make the viewer feel empathy
  • In this photograph by Kilburn, he has stood higher than the scene to take the photograph, as if he is removed, and this is just a neutral image. These photographs become our only knowledge of certain events, and so become our history
  • In comparison, Nachtwey got right it on the action in his photographs
  • Henri Cartier Bresson took photographs of everyday life, however these were highly constructed for aesthetic value - For example, the man and his shadow are mimicking the movements of the dancer on the poster
  • As he has already planned the photograph, it is more than just a record, but art, however, the images still seem to be neutral and aesthetic
  • This poses the question "How much should documentary photography be concerned with aesthetic - does this make it unreal?"
  • Jacob Riis was a social campaigner who photographed squalor and poverty, but it is as if he had a hidden agenda
  • His photography was used in a book which allowed the rich, with their morbid curiosity, to spy on the poor
  • The photograph is not like the invisible eye, instead, these images are superficial as they are set up and the people in them are posing
  • In the photographs there is a struggle as the images are neither about how people project their sense of self or how the photographer depicts their sense of self
  • This photograph of a robbery is staged - Riis bribed street kids to act in a certain way for an interesting image. This is not a real depiction but an artificial representation of the other
  • Lewis Hine was a social campaigner who showed the plight of the immigrant workers, wanting for humanity and empathy
  • A photographer can stamp their representation on people or aim to get the peoples image of themselves out to the world
  • Project FSA was a government campaign to combat social crisis. Images were taken to be used as an emotive lobbying tool
  • This was a controversial project as the photographers had an agenda as they were instructed what to take and how to do this so that the images would be emotive in every way
  • These photographs are not neutral documents
  • The image of the boy and the dog in the newspaper advertisement covered shelter shows how the advertisement culture was surrounding poverty
  • The photographers had to send their negatives back to the government so couldn't destroy the images that they didn't like, some weren't used as considered too confrontational
  • Composition tries to draw similarities with the classical art images of Madonna and child
  • The subjects were arranged like actors
  • Another photograph that wasn't used was a farmer with his children, as this is not the image the government was to project - a starving farmer who has five children
  • Some photographs were used as a reminder of our own mortality. The image of the factory and the graveyard with the houses in between reminds that we work, live and then die
  • In the Victorian Era, photography was about power, used to compare and contrast the 'other' with us. A tool for scrutinising, classifying and documenting. This agenda of trying to justify that black people are inferior to white people was disguised as a scientific pursuit
  • The 'Mass Observation' project was an attempt to develop a neutral democratic record of the working class. As it was a shared vision, as the working class were allowed to send in diaries and images of their everyday life, it could be seen as a more accurate document of the world
  • War and conflict photographs are horrifying but show striking images of human experience
  • Blurring becomes an aesthetic style for one artist - becomes known as the Capa shudder - which represents the drama
  • The Magnum group are a collaborative network that photograph sights of struggle. They believe in internationalism and record work for humanity
  • All photographers have a style, an aesthetic, and their own way to represent their world
  • Images of immense power, such as the photograph which was took a moment before the death of the people involved, spark up a moral question - should you intervene? These photographs are taken with the desire to show horror to someone else in the hope of change

Tuesday, 16 November 2010

Modernist Graphic Design Images

Modernist Graphic Design
These are five images I believe to be Modernist examples of Graphic Design.

What is Modernist Graphic Design?
Qualities defined by Boyne and Rattansi
*Aesthetic self-reflectiveness -Something which is as much about the process of designing as the final piece *Montage and new techniques
*Paradox, ambiguity and uncertainty - Multiple meanings, open to interpretation
*Loss of the integrated individual subject - People weren't confident with identity anymore, they were instead lost in new technology. Mass urbanisation, conspicuous consumption and new leisure activities mean a dizzying change.
*Optimism and utopianism - Modernists wants inequality to vanish, and for the world to be a better place. International fonts such as sans serif could be used all over the world, instead of, for example the German type.
Other qualities associated with Modernist Graphic Design
*No looking back, only forward
*Should be a neutral language, that doesn't discriminate
*Should develop the world and allow for a better future
*Design should be available to all, which can be done by mass-production
*Designs should be tidy, as excessively decorating wasn't seen as progress
*Form should follow function
*Designs should work within the modern world
*Aesthetics are not the most important aspect
*Designs should be eternal and universal

Rodchenko, A (1925) 'Trade union is a defender of female labour' Poster,
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/art/features/alexander-rodchenkos-russian-revolution-1518872.html?action=Gallery







  • The first image, by Rodchenko, is a poster with the translated text saying "Trade union is a defender of female labour". It contains a wedge shape which features in many pieces from the era. The colours and design are simple as this image isn't focusing too much on aesthetic, as form follows function with modernist Graphic Design. Instead the artist wants to get the message across in a simple and effective way.















  • The second image, by Obama's design team, is a modern example which almost mimics the Rodchenko poster of the woman shouting out, due to the position of text and where the image of Obama is placed. Modernist design is supposed to be eternal and universal, and this poster embraces this idea, as it is created much later than the earlier designs, by artists from other countries.









  • Lyubov Popova (1922) Val's. Pamiati Skriabina
    http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A4694&page_number=15&template_id=1&sort_order=1







  • The third image, by Popova, is a simple book cover, which features no fine art, as early Graphic Design did, instead only containing lines and text. There are no signs of excessive decoration, only what is needed is included for effectiveness. There is a mix of fonts - the use of a sans serif font shows is a sign of modernism.







  • Stella McCartney for Adidas Design Team (2010) Olympic Fashion Adverts







  • The fourth image, by Stella McCartney's design team is advertising the clothes she has created for the London 2012 Olympics. It is a photo montage, and contains 'family resemblances' with the other images, such as the use of positioning on a diagonal line. It is different to other adverts around at the moment, making it seem experimental.









  • El Lissitzky (1923), For the Voice
    • The fifth image, by El Lissitzky, shows no signs of looking backwards, instead creating new styles with the alignment of text and lines. It shows a modern page layout, with use of grid and modern fonts.
    Extra Reading

    Smashing Reading (2009), Bauhaus: Ninety Years of Inspiration,
    http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2009/08/02/bauhaus-ninety-years-of-inspiration/