Showing posts with label mechanical reproduction. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mechanical reproduction. Show all posts

Saturday, 24 March 2012

Graphic Design & Mechanical Reproduction




These posters once had authority, now there are thousands of new variants. People change them to fit in with their own identity. They were used to control the majority by the minority, but now they are used by the majority. They aim to be humorous rather than to have authority.

All these examples show that the use of this style of poster is a bit over done, causing the original to lose its authority.

//





This is the example I gave in the mechanical reproduction task, but I thought I would find some more examples of how it has been re-used, not just with a different cities name, but with the love heart replaced with a different example, such as in the Facebook version. The original I love NY logo was designed to be reproduced, but now that has gone even further with the whole idea behind the logo being reproduced and changed to fit peoples identities as they show off what they love.

//


These well known motivational posters by anthonyburrill have sparked graphic designers to create many thousands more examples with their own quotes in them.



From a google search, I found so many more examples, all set out in a similar way. typographical-posters


This one caught my attention as at first I thought it is kind of ironic as this type of poster isn't original, but when you look at it closer you see that it actually says "Don't try to be original, just try to be good". And as this style of poster has been reproduced so many times, the original has lost its aura, as there are so many copies of motivational posters out there to choose from. And as shown in this example, it seems that the graphic designers are more interested in their piece looking good than the actual message being shown, so the meaning behind them has been lost.



In the first year for a group project we made inspirational posters inspired by the Anthony Burrill ones, now looking back, this was such an over done idea!


//

Graphic design is a medium born out of mechanical reproduction. It is designed to be reproduced, but some pieces can have this aura - such as limited edition prints seeming more special, and therefore, they sell for more.

This is an example of a limited edition print from  ilovetypography.com

Monday, 14 November 2011

Seminar 2: Walter Benjamin & Mechanical Reproduction

Seminar Notes:

Relating to Lecture 2: Technology will liberate us

- Original - copy - 
- Technology makes reproduction easier
- Philosophical debate - if exactly the same how is the original effected?
- The way in which technology creates situations where the authority of something can be questioned
- Challenges the authority of art

Task

We then got into groups of three and analysed a section of Walter Benjamin's essay, 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'. We looked at section two.

- No reproduction is unique
- Reproductions lose value
- Original is authentic
- Authenticity is history
- 'Aura' disappears when reproduced
- Original can be put into different situations, so a unique piece of art creates a unique piece of art (this could potentially be a good thing?), allows you to be more creative
- Seem to be pro's and con's in this argument, doesn't make it clear whether reproduction is good thing or bad
- Tradition shattering because art is reproduces in a different time that its unique style
- Starts to not relate to original
- Reproduction is never appreciated as fully as the original, even if a perfect copy exists
- Copy is not valued as much art wise and money wise
- The reproduction means that the original is not as valued either. As the image becomes more accessible it changes the relationship. Reaching wider audience. Bringing into modern times. Different experience.
- There is no creativity in an exact copy
- Technology enhances, e.g. you can restore old photos, and zoom in and see things you couldn't see, etc.

Preface

- Capitalism creates its own gravediggers. 1% get what they want, 99% are working for someone else. - Conditions (a space) mean that mechanical reproduction. Could possibly abolish capitalism. 
- Base: relations between different classes, the range of machinery available
- Superstructure: way you think about the world, culture, religion, law
- Societies are rapidly advancing but art is moving more slowly
- Interested in what happens to art in todays reproductions

I

- Woodcut (birth of graphic design), lithography, photography
- The original reigns with status
- The copy starts to achieve a certain power of its own
- Knowledge became available to everyone with this technology

II

- What Benjamin is saying is relevant now with the internet: it is easy to access art and culture
- Mona Lisa is an example. Makes the original less special as everyone has seen it before.
- Concept of 'aura' - making art seem more important than it actually is
- With mechanical reproduction the aura begins to seem less and less special
- Not just art: this is a way of thinking about the world
- Takes you away from traditional ways. There are traditional ways to think about art. Copies are detached from this
- Gives the reproduced a new aura: re-contextualises how the owner wants it. Rewrites what the place means. 
- New technology, works of art are made from them, can utterly destroy traditional culture

IV

- Tradition is inseparable from works of art. Uniqueness
- Cult - a group with shared ideology
- Aura and ritual go together
- Art is 'the cult of beauty'
- In an art gallery and in church there is similar behaviour. You change how you act, are are respectful. You are expected to feel a certain emotion. (e.g. Rothko room in tate)
- Traditional art - cult value
- Exhibition value - when you take art out of the gallery and put it on the internet, it loses that ritualistic power.
- The more something can be reproduced, the less aura it has

XIV

- Film as art form born out of mechanical reproduction
- Public can have more of an option on it because they can see it in their own way
- Most people don't go to art galleries because they're made to feel stupid if they don't understand it. No expertise. Where at the cinema it is easier to get a judgement on whether it is good or bad. The process of creating meaning is more democratic.
- Film - exhibition value vs. art gallery - cult value
- Forms of art that can be experienced collectively, some forms that can't. With a collective experience, the people have a greater confidence to judge. 
- Way of making us think - a weapon against culture
- Fine artists still think their work has this 'aura', as they don't want to be understood. Politically on opposite sides. 
- The same mode of thinking that makes fascism possible if we think art is 'genius' if we buy into cult stuff
- Benjamin is writing about democracy, creating own meaning, reaching out to the masses, communism

Graphic design is a medium born out of mechanical reproduction. Can have this aura - limited edition prints become more special. Sells for more because of cult value. Re-introdction to handmade elements also takes in back to aura.

Aura (outmoded concept). These things become the 'aura'. 

- Creativity - Genius - Eternal value - Mystery - Authentic - Original - Presence - Tradition

CTS Task: Walter Benjamin & Mechanical Reproduction

Task


Read the Walter Benjamin's essay 'The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'. Write a 300 word analysis of one work of Graphic Design, that you think relates to the themes of the text, and employing quotes, concepts and terminology from the text.

Answer





Milton Glaser's 'I Love New York' is in my eyes one of the most famous pieces of Graphic Design there is. It has been overused and re-printed in different formats so much that it could be argued that it has lost its “uniqueness”, which is an “aura” as described in Walter Benjamin’s essay ‘The Work of Art in The Age of Mechanical Reproduction.’ This loss of aura is deemed as a bad situation, as, “that which withers in the age of mechanical reproduction is the aura of the work of art.”
The ‘I Love New York’ logo was created in 1977, with the purpose of promoting tourism in New York State. The logo because famous after being circulated on white t-shirts. It has become far more popular than it was expected, now being a majorly successful part of American popular culture. It was however, planned with reproduction in mind, “the work of art reproduced becomes the work of art designed for reproducibility.” This mass reproduction stops the image from being seen as ‘art’, but the fact that the presentation boards and initial sketch of the logo are now in the Museum of Modern Art in New York makes it seem like part of it is ‘art’.
The logo has been re-used and changed into so many different things that it has lost its exclusivity, which is the excitement of it being used on a tourist t-shirt you can only buy when you've been on holiday to New York. This is now ruined, as “the authenticity... is jeopardized by reproduction”. The logo now appears on many different items, some quite strange, and is used in different countries, where the design does not fit well. As well as this, parodies of the design, using different symbols to display different messages are widely seen. With so many copies, the original design is not exciting, or as sought after, as, “the quality of its presence is always depreciated.”
Now this item of clothing may not seem as stylish now that everybody owns something with in this design. It no longer seems special; “mechanical reproduction of art changes the reaction of the masses toward art.”
Another example of Graphic Design which now seems not as special, to have lost its “aura” is the massive amount of spin-off 'Keep Calm and Carry On' posters. 




Links
http://c-griffin1013-cts.blogspot.co.uk/2011/10/technology-will-liberate-us.html
Bibliography
  1. Barnard, M. (2005), Graphic Design as Communication (Pages 175-178), 1st edn, Oxon: Routledge
  2. Benjamin, W. (1936), The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction [Online] Available at: < http://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/ge/benjamin.htm > [Accessed 14 November 2011]
  3. Museum of Modern Art. (2010), I (heart) New York Concept Sketch [Online] Available at: < http://www.moma.org/collection/object.php?object_id=128649 > [Accessed 14 November 2011]
  4. Logo Design Love. (2009), I love New York logo [Online] Available at: < http://www.logodesignlove.com/i-love-new-york-logo > [Accessed 14 November 2011]

Saturday, 22 October 2011

Technology Will Liberate Us

Lecture Notes

- Anything that is copied is not the same as the original. Image representation is work in its own right. (Benjamin)
- The relationship between art design and media is born from this scenario
- Machine age (modernism)


- Benjamin claimed technology is parallel to new developments
- Because of photography and technology we now have to consider the original and its unique quality (before technology the only copies were fraud paintings)
- Things like movies and songs get copied and you compare whats better
- Photography is at the beginning of the scenario. It is not just your perception, it is used to create multiple viewing points. 'The camera eye has a variable gaze' 'Camera eye represents technological progress and its faith in it'
- Photograms - early experiments with technology
- Freud & Marx debate
M- Technology changes a value of a work of art. Once design enters modes of consumption the value changes. The original is not necessarily the most valuable when it can be reproduced. Labour and production leads to a bigger consumption of art and design.
- Photography moves one thing in to another context, changing the value
- Marx explores the effects of technology on society
- Freud explorers materialism of technology, the subconscious deepest desires
- Kineticsm captures the movement. Chrono photography is before cinematography - it is the start of exploring how we portray space
- Dematerialisation of art and design. Once you start to look at the moving image it moves away from form and object. Don't have to deal with an object at all.


- Richard Hamilton - uses technology to create image. With technology, objects are coded, ordered and styled, and art and design are merging together. Different types of art come together.
- Marx believes there is a logical relationship between technology and society. It is a role and tool for progress, as well as a tool for alienation.
- The original is produced by one person and their own methods. Reproductions are produced by the 'machine'. One person doesn't always see their work through from the beginning to the end. Social alienation is a result of capitalism.
- Electronic age (postmodernism)
- The computer is a centre for art and design. Moving away from old aesthetic.
- We develop and look for new technology as we are always consuming. We are always updating mobiles etc.
- Fashion becomes conceptual
- Video becomes an object
- Experimentation between different types of art. What can be done with visual images develops. Consumerism has a relationship with image.
- Simulation and simulacrum

 

- There is a direct development from the use of image in technology
- Copy of an experience is not real - simulation
- Simulation also becomes real - simulacrum
- If a piece of art was on fashion item the item becomes a piece of art in its own right
- Plays with illusion- What is real? What is copy? What is virtual, what is not?
- How much time we spend on our computers - is that experience real or not?
- This all links back to panopticism and the illusion of power
- Art uses mass media - attacks seriousness of art. At what point does art become design?
- Digital Age
- Potential leads to multimedia production
- Playing with the real and the fantastical