Tuesday, 9 October 2012

Dissertation: Rough Chapter Plans


Can women’s magazines, focusing on the case study of Cosmopolitan (UK edition), ever be considered feminist?

6-8000 words. Bibliographies, references, quotations and appendices are not included in the word count.

Chapter 1. Introduction. 1000 words
  • A brief history and introduction into feminism.
  • What does it mean to be a feminist?
Chapter 2. Methodology
  • Introducing the gaze theory [relates to 05 essay]
  • John Berger ‘Men act and women appear’
  • How are women depicted in magazines for females? (Through content and advertisements)
  • And why?
  • Why are women depicted differently to men?
Chapter 3. All about Cosmo. [Bulk of essay]
  • Introducing the Cosmopolitan ‘F’ world campaign
  • Background information about cosmopolitan, including a brief history and relevant information about target audience and numbers of readership etc.
  • Information answering these questions:
  • Do the articles end up lowering self-esteem (so you buy the products advertised) or helping women?
  • Has Cosmopolitan (and its portrayal of women) changed since its launch?
  • Primary research - examples of the content of the magazine which can be considered feminist and examples which disprove this [triangulated argument]
Chapter 4. Design & Accessibility

  • What should a feminist magazine include? [Primary Research]
  • Try to get primary feedback from feminists such as Vagenda magazine
  • Audience theory: Discuss what the target audience want to see in the magazines they buy in comparison to what they are getting.
  • What are the pros of advertising a magazine as being feminist in relation to how the audience will view that magazine?

Chapter 5. Design Activism
  • What is design activism?
  • How can design cause social change?
  • Has the content of magazines like Cosmopolitan made it socially acceptable for women to be treated the way they are?
  • Is Cosmopolitan written and designed by men or women? And does this effect the content of the magazine?
  • Is the feminist campaign trying to disrupt the superstructure cycle and cause change?
  • But does the content of the magazine disrupt any progress this campaign has done?
Chapter 6. Conclusion. 1000 words

Answering these questions:
  • Can Cosmopolitan be considered feminist?
  • How would it have to change to be considered so?
  • What good does the magazine do for feminism?
  • Which magazines can be considered feminist?
Questions to ask at tutorial:
  • Do all chapters have to be the same size?
  • Are the into + conclusion chapters or as well as the four?
  • Am i going off topic discussing too many theories?

No comments:

Post a Comment